A child god, probably Harpokrates
Description
Statuette, standing Harpokrates. Ptolemaic Period, 1st century B.C. or earlier. Leaded bronze, formerly gilded. h. 16 cm (6 5/16 in); w. 5.6 cm (2 3/16 in); d. 2.4 cm (15/16 in). From: Sacred Animal Necropolis, Falcon Catacomb Gallery 6, niche 6a, North Saqqara, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: EES excavations 1969-71. Credit: The Adelaide Milton de Groot Fund, in memory of the de Groot and Hawley families, 1976.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
The image shows a small bronze/metal figurine of a nude child-like male deity standing upright, with a raised disk/ornament on the head and a high, column-like headdress element behind the head.
The artifact is presented as a full-figure view against a plain background. A nude, child-like male figure stands with one arm raised toward the chest and the other down by the side. The head has a detailed face with simplified facial features and a headdress composed of a central element rising above the brow, surrounded by multiple rounded rib-like columns/sections (suggestive of a lotus/feathered or flabellum-like crown). The figure’s torso and limbs are naturalistically modeled but worn, with darkened/burnished surfaces indicating corrosion or remaining metal patina. No clearly readable inscriptions, cartouches, or Greek/Coptic/Arabic text are visible in the image. The object’s surface appears bronze/gilt-plated in parts, though much gilding may have worn away, consistent with a formerly gilded object.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116276242 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 1976.63.2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 547905 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.