Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · statue

Ear from a statue of king or queen

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Head of Akhenaten or Nefertiti, ear fragment. New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Indurated limestone. H. 2.6 x W. 2.3 x D. 2.6 cm. From: Great Temple of the Aten, pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Credit: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1957.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragmentary carved Egyptian ear-shaped piece, likely belonging to a larger statue, shown in white/grey indurated limestone.

The image shows a small, broken three-dimensional fragment with a contour resembling the outer ear. The surface is light grey to off-white with a chalky texture and visible pitting consistent with stone weathering and breakage. No clear traces of painted decoration, fine facial features, or attached wig/hair elements are visible on this fragment. The form suggests a molded/carroved feature from a statue rather than an inscribed object.

decorative New Kingdom, Amarna Period (as catalogued); exact attribution from image unclear fragmentary
Materials indurated limestone (as catalogued)

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273513 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 57.180.82 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549634 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.