Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Right foot of Akhenaten or Nefertiti prostrate

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Akhenaten or Nefertiti prostrate, foot/leg. New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1352–1336 B.C. Indurated limestone. H. 10 × W. 6.8 × D. 6 cm (3 15/16 × 2 11/16 × 2 3/8 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, Pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Subject: Feet. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1921.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Stone fragment carved with molded human anatomy, likely part of a prostrate royal figure’s body (foot/leg area).

The image shows a roughly rectangular, vertically oriented fragment of carved stone with a chipped surface and missing portions along the edges. The lower portion includes a partly preserved sculpted form of a leg/foot with toes and the suggestion of a bent posture. Above, faint carved relief traces indicate clothing folds or limbs, but finer details (such as facial features or full body proportions) are not preserved. No clear hieroglyphs, cartouches, or readable text are visible. The surface appears light-colored and consistent with limestone, with additional weathering/erosion across the face.

royal New Kingdom, Amarna Period (per catalogue); exact attribution unclear from the image alone fragmentary
Materials indurated limestone (light-colored stone)

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273498 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 21.9.521 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549648 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.