Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Foot and leg of Akhenaten or Nefertiti prostrate

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1352–1336 B.C. Indurated limestone. L. 10.5 × W. 16.5 × H. 15 cm (4 1/8 × 6 1/2 × 5 7/8 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Subject: Nefertiti, Feet. Credit: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1957.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragment of an indurated limestone sculpture showing a rounded foot/leg-related contour and smooth carved surface, likely from a larger prostrate figure.

The image shows a single stone fragment with a curved, blocky outline consistent with a carved limb/foot portion. The surface is largely plain and worn, with shallow incised/tool marks and loss along the edges. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or figure attributes (e.g., facial features, crown, or hands) are visible on this fragment. The breakage appears ancient or heavily abraded; details that might distinguish Akhenaten from Nefertiti are not present in the visible area.

unclear New Kingdom, Amarna Period (catalogue ground truth; visible features are insufficient to refine). fragmentary
Materials indurated limestone

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273496 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 57.180.98 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549652 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.