upper left arm and elbow with Aten cartouches
Description
Upper left arm and elbow, Aten cartouches. New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Red quartzite. H. 14.9 × W. 7 × D. 4 cm (5 7/8 × 2 3/4 × 1 9/16 in.); cartouche: W. 2 cm (13/16 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Subject: Cartouches, Hieroglyphs. Credit: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1957.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A carved red quartzite fragment shaped like an upper arm/elbow, incised with two stacked cartouche-like hieroglyphic ovals containing the Aten’s royal titulary.
The object is a small, roughly trapezoid/rounded stone piece with a distinct upper portion that tapers slightly, consistent with a carved anatomical element (upper arm and elbow). On the front face, two vertically aligned cartouche-like cartouches are incised in low relief. The left and right cartouches each contain multiple hieroglyph signs arranged in vertical columns, with a central sign group that appears Aten-related, though the full reading is not fully certain from the photo. The reverse is not clearly visible. No painted pigment or modern labels are visible. The background is a plain light surface, and the stone color appears reddish-brown, consistent with the catalogue material.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273432 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 57.180.42 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549690 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.