Biconical alabastron with zones of bichrome decoration including floral elements, dancers, and Bes-like figures
Description
Vase, alabastron. Ptolemaic Period, 332–30 B.C. Faience. H. 11.8 × Greatest diam. 3.1 cm (4 5/8 × 1 1/4 in.). Possibly from: Naukratis, Western Delta. Credit: Purchase, Fletcher Fund and The Guide Foundation Inc. Gift, 1966.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Faience biconical container with horizontal decorative bands and painted/relief-like bichrome motifs, including seated Bes-like figures and floral/starburst elements.
The object is a small faience vessel with a rounded biconical body and a narrow neck. A small loop/handle-like element is visible near the upper body/neck. The surface is decorated with multiple horizontal zones separated by darker bands. Within these zones are repeated motif elements: several starburst or rosette-like floral forms in pale/white lines, and at least one central zone showing a Bes-like deity-like figure (arms/legs and a face-like element) rendered in a stylized manner. Colors appear predominantly turquoise/blue-green with darker outlines and lighter (cream/white) decorative lines; there are no clearly legible inscriptions visible on the provided image. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is apparent.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273392 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 66.99.70 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549697 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.