Scarab Inscribed for the God's Wife Hatshepsut
Description
Scarab; Hatshepsut, God's Wife; simple back. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, early, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Steatite (glazed). L. 1.8 cm (11/16 in); w. 1.3 cm (1/2 in); h. 0.8 cm (5/16 in). From: Temple of Hatshepsut, Foundation Deposit 9 (I), Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1926–27. Subject: Hieroglyphs, Scarabs. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1927.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A green-glazed steatite scarab seal with an incised design filled with dark linework on its oval back.
The image shows the back (dorsal) of a small oval scarab-shaped object. The surface is predominantly green with a glazed finish, and the central field is bordered by a rounded oval frame. Inside the frame there are multiple rows of dark, incised motifs that read visually like hieroglyphic signs (rather than a purely anatomical scarab design), including blocky rectangular and vertical strokes as well as wedge/triangular elements. No clear cartouche or fully legible royal name is visible at this resolution. There is no visible Greek/Coptic/Arabic text. The object edges show slight wear and uneven glaze, but the incised lines remain visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273362 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 27.3.176 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549706 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.