Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Scarab Inscribed with a Geometric Pattern

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Scarab; plant?; notched back. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, early, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Steatite (glazed). L. 1.4 cm (9/16 in.); w. 1.1 cm (7/16 in.); h. 0.7 cm (1/4 in.). From: Temple of Hatshepsut, Foundation Deposit 9 (I), Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1926–27. Subject: Scarabs. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1927.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, oval scarab seal with a glazed green surface, showing an incised/relief central geometric or patterned field.

The image shows an oval scarab-shaped object viewed straight-on. The surface is predominantly green with lighter areas and visible glaze wear/abrading. The design consists of darkened incised lines forming a compact central motif surrounded by a geometric border/frame. No readable royal titulary, cartouche, or clear deity iconography is distinguishable from the visible patterning. The object appears to be made of a glazed ceramic/stone material consistent with steatite glazing as stated in the catalogue.

decorative New Kingdom (as catalogued) good
Materials green glazed surfacesteatite (glazed)
Signs Incised geometric/pattern motif (non-specific)

Connections

Found at Deir el-Bahri

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273210 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 27.3.363 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549746 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.