Scarab Inscribed with a Hieroglyphic Motif
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, early, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Steatite (glazed). L. 1.7 cm (11/16 in); w. 1.2 cm (1/2 in); h. 0.8 cm (5/16 in). From: Temple of Hatshepsut, Foundation Deposit 7 (G), Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1926–27. Subject: Hieroglyphs, Scarabs. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1927.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Glazed green-blue scarab-shaped amulet inscribed with dark-blue/black hieroglyphic-style markings on its visible face.
The image shows an oval scarab form with a glossy glazed surface in turquoise/green-blue tones, worn at edges with small chips. Dark hieroglyph-like signs are painted/etched on the face, arranged vertically and symmetrically: a central upright motif that resembles a standing sign (possibly a column-like or seated figure), flanked by two circular/oval elements. Additional small strokes and a horizontal base line are visible near the lower portion. No readable royal cartouche, clear deity name, or complete inscription is fully legible from this single image; the marks are best recorded as hieroglyphic motif elements rather than specific transliterations. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273194 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 27.3.373 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549755 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.