Wig of Nefertiti, inscribed
Description
Nefertiti head/wig. New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1352–1336 B.C. Indurated limestone. H. 21 × W. 21 × D. 10 cm (8 1/4 × 8 1/4 × 3 15/16 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, Pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1921.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Photograph of a broken Egyptian inscribed limestone object shaped like a wig/helmet front, with incised hieroglyphs in the central register.
The artifact is a light-colored, weathered piece of indurated limestone, forming a triangular/rounded wig-like silhouette. A recessed central panel contains incised hieroglyphic signs arranged vertically, including a cartouche-like enclosure and vertical strokes; the surrounding surfaces show heavy chipping and losses. A small handwritten/printed accession number appears on the lower edge, reading “21.9.442” (ink or pencil-like marking). No visible modern mounting or adhesive is apparent. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The depicted hieroglyphs do not provide enough clarity in this image to reliably transcribe the full name or inscription excerpt.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273131 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 21.9.442 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549781 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.