Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Raised relief fragment

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Relief, Tomb of Nespekashuty. Late Period, Saite, Dynasty 26, reign of Psamtik I, 664–610 B.C. Limestone, mortar traces. H. 6 × D. 2 cm (2 3/8 × 13/16 in.). From: Tomb of Nespekashuty (TT 312, MMA 509), 1st chamber E. wall; N. section, Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1922–23. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1923.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A long, broken Egyptian relief fragment with shallow carved surface and visible red pigment traces on a beige limestone body.

The object is a flat, elongated piece broken on both ends and along the top edge, preserving a band-like carved surface consistent with a raised-relief element. The surface is generally light beige with weathering and scattered red pigment spots and streaks. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or human/animal figures are identifiable in the provided image due to abrasion and incomplete preservation. There is no visible metal or stone inlay; only stone surface and pigment traces are apparent. The fragment’s appearance matches a limestone relief wall element; the presence of red paint aligns with typical painted Egyptian reliefs, though specific iconography cannot be confirmed from this photograph.

decorative Late Period, Saite (as catalogued) fragmentary
Materials limestone (stone body)red pigment tracesmortar/adhesive traces (uncertain but hinted by uneven edges)

Connections

Found at Deir el-Bahri
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.