Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Uraeus Amulet of Djedmutesankh

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Third Intermediate Period, Dynasty 21, ca. 1000–945 B.C. Sheet gold. H. 2 × W. 1.3 cm (13/16 × 1/2 in.). From: Tomb MMA 60, Chamber, Burial of Djedmutesankh (Ch5), Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1923–24. Subject: Serpents. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1925.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small gilded amulet in the shape of a rearing cobra (uraeus), rendered in sheet-gold form on a plain background.

The object is a thin, gold-colored sheet-metal amulet shaped like an uraeus: a cobra with a raised hood and a visible head, facing upward/right. Incised/embossed linear markings decorate the body (including a central vertical column of short lines) and the hood area. A small tail/serpentine extension extends downward/left. No readable hieroglyphic characters, cartouches, or other inscriptions are clearly visible in the image. The surface appears reflective and intact, though minor edges look irregular as expected for a small sheet-metal artifact.

decorative Third Intermediate Period (per catalogue; image itself not sufficient for independent dating) good
Deities Uraeus (cobra)
Materials sheet gold (gilded gold-colored metal)

Connections

Found at Deir el-Bahri
Deities Uraeus

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116275687 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 25.3.167 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 548256 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.