Tile Inlay from the Palace of Ramesses II
Description
New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Ramesses II, ca. 1279–1213 B.C. Faience. L. 10.5 × H. 10.5 × W. 2.5 cm (4 1/8 × 4 1/8 × 1 in.). From: Palace of Ramesses II, Qantir (Piramesse), Eastern Delta, Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Rogers Fund, Edward S. Harkness Gift and by exchange, 1922, 1929, 1935.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Fragment of an Egyptian faience inlay tile decorated with black-and-red striping and a pale blue field, forming part of a geometric/architectural pattern.
The image shows a broken, rectangular tile fragment with rounded top corners. The front face is divided into bands: a pale blue upper field with a light decorative motif and black-lined markings; a thin horizontal black line near the middle; a red horizontal band across the midsection; and a lower cream/beige band. Several black double-line borders outline segments, and there are additional small black marks on the pale blue area resembling stylized strokes rather than readable text. No cartouche, royal name, or clear hieroglyph sequence is visible on the fragment. No identifiable deities are depicted—decoration appears geometric or ornamental rather than figural. The break edges suggest it was set into a larger surface as inlay. Materials appear consistent with faience (glazed, colored surface), and the visible colors (light blue, red, cream) match typical painted/glazed inlay fragments.
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.