Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · cosmetic_object

Palette in the form of a mud turtle

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Palette, mud turtle. Predynastic, Naqada II, ca. 3650–3500 B.C. Greywacke. L. 15 × W. 11 cm (5 7/8 × 4 5/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Turtles. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1910.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Stone palette shaped like a turtle, with two drilled circular openings near the upper portion, suggesting a stylized head and eye sockets.

The object is a single-piece grey-green stone (palette) carved into the outline of a mud turtle. The upper portion forms a small raised “head” with two round, drilled features resembling eye openings. The central body is broadly rounded and symmetrical, with a shallow concavity/flattened working surface implied by the overall flatness of the face. The lower edge is irregular, consistent with natural breakage or ancient shaping. No carved hieroglyphs, cartouches, or inscriptions are visible in the image. No visible painted decoration or inlay is present, and the surface shows weathering and minor chips. The image does not show additional objects or text labels that could provide extra identification.

decorative Predynastic (Naqada II), per catalogue fragmentary
Materials greywacke (stone)

Connections

Materials Greywacke

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116277677 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 10.176.81 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 547369 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.