Relief Fragments Depicting a Court Scene
Description
Talatat, birds. New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Limestone, paint. H. 23.5 cm (9 1/4 in); w. 53.3 cm (21 in). Probably from: Hermopolis (Ashmunein; Khemenu), Middle Egypt. Subject: Flowers. Credit: Gift of Norbert Schimmel, 1985.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A painted limestone relief fragment shows part of a courtly scene with human figures and retained pigment along the edges and background.
The image depicts a rectangular stone relief fragment with broken edges and a worn central field. Painted areas in red (skin/clothing zones and side fields) and pale blue/grey (details of garments or ornamental elements) remain visible. In the left half, a partial upper body and head of a figure are preserved, along with an adjacent smaller figure or attendant whose raised arm and hand gesture are visible. In the middle, a larger figure’s torso and a section of clothing with incised/raised linear detailing are visible. On the far right, only the edge of another figure or decorative element is preserved, including a vertical band of red paint and a streak of white/pale paint. No clear hieroglyphs, cartouches, or inscriptions are legible; the background includes shallow relief and traces of paint but no identifiable text. The overall composition suggests a court scene consistent with the catalogue description, though specific names/titles cannot be confirmed from this fragment alone.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273853 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 1985.328.4 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549204 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.