Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Tile Inlay depicting a Wig

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Ramesses II, ca. 1279–1213 B.C. Faience. H. 6.4 × W. 87 × D. 2 cm (2 1/2 × 34 1/4 × 13/16 in.). From: Palace of Ramesses II, Qantir (Piramesse), Eastern Delta, Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Rogers Fund, Edward S. Harkness Gift and by exchange, 1922, 1929, 1935.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragmentary small inlay tile showing a molded/checkered pattern suggestive of hair or a wig design.

The image depicts a broken, irregularly shaped object with a curved profile. The surface is worn and brownish-gray, with raised molded decoration arranged in curved, overlapping bands and small repeating rectangles that could correspond to stylized wig/hair strands. No clearly readable hieroglyphs, cartouches, or inscriptions are visible on the shown surfaces. The object appears more like a ceramic/stone inlay fragment than a complete, colored faience plaque; discoloration and loss of surface material make precise material identification from the photo alone difficult. No deities or royal names can be securely identified from the visible pattern.

decorative New Kingdom, Ramesside period (as catalogued); exact dating unclear from image alone. fragmentary
Materials ceramic-like material (exact type unclear)

Connections

Royals Ramesses II

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116415743 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 35.1.37 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549221 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.