Tile with a papyrus plant
Description
Tile, palace of Ramesses II. New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Ramesses II, ca. 1279–1213 B.C. Faience. L. 10 cm (3 15/16 in), w. 12 cm (4 3/4 in), Depth 3 cm (1 3/16 in). From: Palace of Ramesses II, Private apartments, Qantir (Piramesse), Eastern Delta, Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Rogers Fund, Edward S. Harkness Gift and by exchange, 1922, 1929, 1935.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Broken faience tile fragment decorated with a brown/black motif resembling a stylized plant or papyrus form.
The image shows a small, irregularly broken rectangular ceramic/faience tile fragment. The decoration is painted in dark brown/black lines on a light background. A central vertical, wedge-like form with adjacent vertical strokes suggests a stylized plant with banded leaves or reeds; at the left are two curved, oval shapes attached to a larger central element, consistent with a schematic botanical or papyrus-plant icon. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or named royal texts are visible; the dark marks appear decorative rather than textual. The fragment’s edges are chipped, indicating a partial object, and there is no visible glaze detail beyond the overall light-colored surface.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116415752 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 35.1.109 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549234 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.