Menat fragment
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Faience. H. 5 × W. 3.3 cm (1 15/16 × 1 5/16 in.). From: Hatshepsut Hole, Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1923–24. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1923.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small blue faience fragment with dark incised/painted Egyptian-style symbols, including a prominent stylized collar/ankh-like motif at the top and additional indeterminate signs below.
The object is a blue (turquoise/greenish) ceramic/glazed fragment with a broken, irregular shape. The surface shows dark markings that appear to be incised or painted hieroglyphic-style signs, framed by vertical bands. At the upper portion there is a distinctive rectangular/collar-like emblem (possibly a stylized sign) rendered in dark linework. Below it, there are multiple additional signs, one resembling an ankh or looped symbol and another resembling a staff/rod-like vertical element; however, specific identifications are uncertain from this image alone. No legible royal name cartouche is visible. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is seen. The catalogue identification as a “Menat fragment” is broadly plausible given the presence of iconographic collar-like forms, but because the exact menat-related motif is not definitively confirmable here, the visual–catalogue match is only cautious.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273754 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 23.3.84 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 549396 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.