Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Jar

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Jar, lug handles. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Amenhotep III, ca. 1390–1352 B.C. Indurated limestone. H. 10 cm (3 15/16 in). From: Palace of Amenhotep III, Rubbish Mounds, Malqata, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1910–11. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1911.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, plain ceramic/jar-like vessel fragment with one circular suspension/handle hole near the rim.

The image shows a light-colored, roughly ovoid jar with a rounded body and an irregular rim. On the upper left side there is a single circular hole, likely for attachment or suspension; the handle/loop is not fully preserved. The surface is undecorated and worn, with visible cracks and flaking that expose lighter interior areas. No painted decoration or carved relief is clearly visible. There are no legible hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic inscriptions visible on the photographed surfaces. The overall appearance is consistent with a stone vessel, but the exact material (e.g., indurated limestone) cannot be confirmed from the image alone.

decorative New Kingdom (as catalogued); exact dating unclear from image alone fragmentary
Materials light-colored stone or ceramic (exact type unclear)

Connections

Found at Malqata
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.