Inlay depicting enthroned god Shepsi
Description
Late Period–Ptolemaic Period, 4th century B.C. Faience. H. 15 cm (5 7/8 in.); W. 10.2 cm (4 in.); D. 1 cm (3/8 in.). Possibly from: Hermopolis (Ashmunein; Khemenu), Middle Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1926.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A greenish faience inlay/block shows a seated, front-facing male figure wearing a tripartite wig and holding an ankh-like object in one hand, with a decorated throne base behind/under him.
The artifact depicts a human-like deity or divine figure seated on a rectangular throne or base with patterned borders. The head is shown in profile to the left (facing left), with a stylized headdress/wig and a broad facial outline. A beaded or pleated collar or garment is indicated across the chest. One hand is raised toward the torso and holds an ankh-shaped symbol; the other arm rests down by the side. The throne/base is decorated with geometric scales or fish-scale patterning on the upper field and horizontal register-like bands at the bottom. Small painted/inscribed decorative areas appear on the throne face, but no clearly legible individual hieroglyphs are confidently identifiable from the image resolution. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116252449 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 26.7.997 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 551332 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.