Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Ring Fragment with ankh

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Ring fragment, ankh. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Amenhotep III, ca. 1390–1352 B.C. Faience, blue. L. 1.3 cm (1/2 in). From: Palace of Amenhotep III, Malqata, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1910–11. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1911.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Blue faience ring fragment with a recessed central emblem that appears ankh-like, surrounded by incised decorative bands.

The object is a small, curved fragment of a ring made of light-to-medium blue faience. One face shows a recessed, rounded oval/bow-like central motif with a surrounding border, formed by incised lines and a raised rim. Small stippled/point-like marks occur near the central border, and a partial loop-like feature suggests the top of an ankh symbol, consistent with an “ankh” emblem. The underside/edge is worn and unfinished-looking, indicating breakage. No clearly legible hieroglyphic text, cartouches, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic inscriptions are visible in the photograph.

decorative New Kingdom (per catalogue; visual styling consistent but not decisive) fragmentary
Materials faienceblue (glaze)
Signs ankh (cross with loop)

Connections

Found at Malqata
Materials FaienceBlue
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.