Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Ring Fragment

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Ring fragment, Taweret. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Amenhotep III, ca. 1390–1352 B.C. Faience, violet. L. 1.5 cm (9/16 in). From: Palace of Amenhotep III, Malqata, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1910–11. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1911.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Photograph of a small, curved faience fragment shaped like part of an Egyptian ring, with a dark violet surface and several molded openings.

The object is shown isolated against a light background. It appears as a fragment of a hoop/setting with a flattened, curved profile. The surface is predominantly violet/dark blue-violet with a granular, glossy glaze typical of faience. On the front face, recessed molded shapes form a symmetrical design with multiple oval/rectangular cutouts/voids (at least three openings visible). A vertical ridge-like element and partial border thickness suggest this fragment belonged to a larger ring bezel or decorative cartouche-like mount, but no clear hieroglyphs or cartouches are legible on the exposed area. No inscriptions, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text are visible in the image.

decorative New Kingdom (per catalogue); image does not provide enough diagnostic stylistic details for an independent date. fragmentary
Materials faienceviolet glaze

Connections

Found at Malqata
Deities Taweret
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.