Offering Table of Tjaenhesret, priest of Thoth, son of Iaa
Description
Offering Table, Tjaenhesret. Ptolemaic Period, 332–30 B.C. Limestone. H. 39.5 cm (15 9/16 in.); W. 35.3 cm (13 7/8 in.); D. 5.8 cm (2 5/16in.). Probably from: Hermopolis (Ashmunein; Khemenu), Middle Egypt. Subject: Men, Hieroglyphs. Credit: Bequest of George D. Pratt, 1935.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Limestone offering-tablet shape block covered frontally with incised Egyptian hieroglyphs and a central relief scene of a kneeling offering figure before an enthroned deity.
The object appears as a rectangular limestone offering-tablet/block with a raised, thicker top element. The front face is densely filled with incised hieroglyphic text in multiple horizontal lines flanking and surrounding a central relief. In the middle, a human figure kneels at left with arms extended toward offerings; at right is an enthroned seated figure representing a deity, identifiable only generally by its iconic seated posture. Between/around them are hieroglyphs and small offering-related elements. No royal cartouche is clearly legible in the provided image. The style and script strongly suggest an offering/ritual text-table, consistent with an epigraphic dedication to a priest and a god, though the specific names (e.g., Tjaenhesret) and divine name (Thoth) cannot be read with certainty from this image resolution.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116256514 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 48.149.5 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 550781 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.