Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Tiles and ornaments from the palace of Ramesses II

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Ramesses II, ca. 1279–1213 B.C. Faience. Diam. 3.4 cm (1 5/16 in.); Th. 0.4 cm (3/16 in.). From: Palace of Ramesses II, Private apartments, Qantir (Piramesse), Eastern Delta, Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Rogers Fund, Edward S. Harkness Gift and by exchange, 1922, 1929, 1935.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Round faience tile fragment with a central rosette/starburst design in dark blue-purple pigment on a light yellow/tan ground.

The image shows a small, circular fragment of an ornamental tile. The surface is light yellow to tan with a worn-looking edge. In the center is a symmetrical rosette or starburst motif formed by multiple curved petals/segments in a dark blue-purple color. The motif appears pressed or painted directly onto the tile; there is no clearly legible hieroglyphic text or figure work visible. The object is photographed against a plain light gray background with no additional inscriptions, borders, or mountings visible. Overall preservation is fragmentary, with some loss around the perimeter and pigment wear.

decorative New Kingdom, Ramesside period (as catalogued) fragmentary
Materials faience

Connections

Royals Ramesses II
Materials Faience

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116235198 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 35.1.133 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 550859 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.