Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Canopic jar lid with head of a baboon (Hapy)

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Third Intermediate Period–Ptolemaic Period, Dynasty 21–30, ca. 1070–332 B.C. Limestone. H. 12.5 × W. 12.4 × D. 14.9 cm × Diam. of foot 6.5 cm (4 15/16 × 4 7/8 × 5 7/8 2 9/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Baboons. Credit: Anonymous Gift, 1971.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Limestone sculptural lid showing a baboon’s head with incised facial details, shown frontally.

The object is a sculpted, rounded form consistent with the top of a canopic jar lid. Centered on the piece is the head of a baboon: a square-ish snout with carved nostrils, a mouth line, and symmetrical features around the face. The ears are indicated by molded/raised shapes on either side of the head. The background surface is broadly shaped and worn, with the baboon head emerging as the main raised element. No clear hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or additional inscriptions are visible on the photographed surface. The piece appears light-colored and matte, consistent with stone.

funerary Third Intermediate Period–Ptolemaic Period (per catalogue ground truth); exact sub-phase unclear from image alone. good
Deities Hapy (baboon-associated deity, per catalogue title)
Materials limestone

Connections

Deities Hapi
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116246130 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 1971.224 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 553248 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.