Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Large red polished ware jar

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Jar, red polished ware. Predynastic Period, ca. 3850–2960 B.C. Pottery. Probably from: Abadiya, Northern Upper Egypt. Excavation: EEF excavations 1898-1899. Credit: Gift of Egypt Exploration Fund, 1899.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A photographed ceramic storage jar with a reddish, polished surface and rounded shoulders, shown front-on against a plain background.

The image shows a single large earthenware jar painted a red-brown tone with a relatively smoothed/polished exterior. The vessel has a short, rounded neck opening and a wide body that tapers slightly toward the base; the rim is thickened. Scuffing and flaking are visible across the surface, with lighter patches where coating may be worn away. No painted decoration, handles, or incised ornamentation are clearly visible. The jar is mounted on a modern metal support ring/stand, which is not part of the original object. No hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible on the jar in this image. The museum catalogue calls the object a “Large red polished ware jar” of the Predynastic Period from Abadiya; the visual characteristics (red polished ceramic jar form) are consistent with that description, though the image alone does not allow secure confirmation of period or exact findspot.

daily life Predynastic Period (per catalogue; not independently confirmable from image) poor
Materials potteryred slip/polish (surface coating)

Connections

Found at Abadiya
Materials Pottery
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.