Fragment of Scarab Inscribed for Seti I
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 19, reign of Seti I, ca. 1294–1279 B.C. Glazed steatite. L. 3.7 cm (1 7/16 in.). From: Cemetery, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1908–09. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1909.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
An oval scarab/seal-shaped steatite fragment bears incised hieroglyphic lines arranged in a bordered field.
The object is a small, roughly oval scarab/seal fragment with an incised rectangular/bordered inscription field. Within the field, multiple horizontal rows of hieroglyph-like signs are cut into the surface; individual sign forms are partially worn but the layout clearly follows an Egyptian inscription style. Above the central rows there is a raised sculptural form resembling a cobrasnakes/ornament and additional vertical elements, consistent with decorative or royal/ceremonial detailing typical of inscribed scarabs. The outer edge is rounded with no visible mounting; no clear back details are visible. The surface appears dull with no obvious modern coating; despite the catalogue stating “glazed steatite,” the image does not clearly show a glaze sheen, so the material is recorded as unclear beyond likely stone.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116416462 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 09.180.928 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 550169 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.