Magical Figure
Description
Late Middle Kingdom–Second Intermediate Period, Dynasty 13–SIP, ca. 1802–1550 B.C. Clay (unfired). H. 6.7 cm (2 5/8 in.); W. 3.2 cm (1 1/4 in.). From: west of tomb of Senwosretankh, surface deposit, Lisht South, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1932–33. Subject: Faces. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1933.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small, rectangular, unglazed clay fragment with a recessed/flattened area on the upper portion, resembling a damaged molded or inscribed surface.
The object appears as a vertically oriented, irregular rectangular plaque/figurine fragment made of coarse clay. The surface is worn and abraded, with a faintly defined horizontal seam or boundary across the midsection. Near the top, there is a shallow depressed/flattened zone that could have held molded features or pigment, but no clearly recognizable facial/body figure is preserved. Small patches of discoloration—most notably reddish-orange staining—are visible on the lower half; the staining could be remnants of pigment or surface alteration. No legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or Greek/Coptic/Arabic text are clearly visible in the provided image. No specific deities or royal names can be securely identified from the preserved details.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116281384 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 33.1.95 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 546378 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.