Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · statue

Figurine, donkey

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, ca. 1550–1295 B.C. Pottery, paint. L. 9 cm (3 9/16 in.); W. 7.2 cm (2 13/16 in.). From: Dra Abu el-Naga, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon/Carter excavations, before 1911. Subject: Donkeys. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1912.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small pottery figurine depicting a donkey, shown in profile with a rounded body, raised head, and four short legs.

The image shows a hand-modeled clay figurine with the body of a donkey oriented to the left. The donkey’s head is formed as a rounded mass with a slightly defined muzzle and ear area; the back is arched and the legs are short and separate, with the front legs more visible and the hind legs implied beneath the body. A small tail nub is visible at the rear. Surfaces appear light brown/terracotta with traces of red paint on parts of the body (notably around the head/neck area and possible spots along the torso). No clear surface inscriptions are visible, and no cartouches or readable hieroglyphs can be confirmed from the photograph.

decorative New Kingdom (as catalogued) good
Materials pottery/terracottapaint (red traces)

Connections

Found at Dra Abu el-Naga
Materials Paint

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116244963 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 12.181.273 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 554340 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.