Jar of Amenhotep I
Description
Jar, Amenhotep I. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Amenhotep I, ca. 1525–1504 B.C. Travertine (Egyptian alabaster). H. 20 × W. 10.2 × D. 4.7 cm (7 7/8 × 4 × 1 7/8 in.). From: Tomb AN-B, Dra Abu el-Naga, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon/Carter excavations. Credit: Gift of the Earl of Carnarvon, 1921.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A rectangular, columnar stone jar fragment/standing section with a small vertical face bearing painted or incised Egyptian hieroglyphs.
The image shows a light-colored stone vessel fragment set on a small stand against a dark background. The object has a flat top with a break and a tapered/rounded lower portion, suggesting it is a surviving portion of a jar rather than a complete vessel. On the front upper portion there is a compact register of Egyptian hieroglyphs rendered in dark ink or pigment (the lines look like incised/painted marks filled with color). The hieroglyphs include multiple stacked signs and what appears to be a cartouche-like or name-box element, though the exact king’s name and determinatives cannot be read confidently at this resolution. No deities are clearly legible from the visible signs. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The stone surface appears smooth and semi-translucent, consistent with the catalogue’s stated travertine/Egyptian alabaster material, though this cannot be independently confirmed beyond appearance. Condition appears fragmentary due to the broken top/edges.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116425850 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 21.7.2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 554480 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.