Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Jar

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, ca. 1550–1295 B.C. Pottery. H. 29.5 cm (11 5/8 in.). Said to be from: Dra Abu el-Naga, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Credit: Gift of Dr. and Mrs. Thomas H. Foulds, 1925.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A painted ceramic jar with a rounded belly and flaring neck, decorated with dark linear bands and a cross-like vertical/diagonal motif.

The image shows a single Egyptian pottery jar photographed against a plain background. The vessel has two small, rounded lug-like handles on either side just below the neck, a thick flaring rim, and a narrow neck leading to a globular body. The surface is painted in dark pigment: several curved and straight banded lines decorate the shoulder and body, including a broad central vertical band and intersecting/angled lines that resemble a stylized cross or framework motif. No figurative scenes, inscriptions, or cartouches are clearly visible. The fabric appears to be ceramic/pottery with a fired surface; the pigment is consistent with applied paint. The photograph includes no Greek/Coptic/Arabic text; any tiny marks are too indistinct to read as hieroglyphs.

daily life New Kingdom (as per catalogue) good
Materials pottery/ceramicpaint/pigment

Connections

Found at Dra Abu el-Naga

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116244758 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 25.7.16 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 554512 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.