Cup of Nesikhonsu
Description
Cup, Nesikhonsu. Third Intermediate Period or later, Dynasty 21, Reign of High Priest Painedjem II, ca. 990–969 B.C. Faience. H. 6.1 × Dia. 4.5 cm (2 3/8 × 1 3/4 in.). Probably from: First Royal Cache (TT 320), Burial of Nesikhonsu, Valleys south of Deir el-Bahri, Valley of the Cachette, Upper Egypt, Thebes. Excavation: Egyptian Antiquities Service/Maspero excavations, 1881. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1921.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small turquoise-blue faience cup with an incised/painted hieroglyphic inscription on the exterior wall.
The object is a squat, conical cup (open top, slightly constricting toward the base) in a glossy turquoise-blue material. The surface shows minor chips and worn areas. On the front-facing area, a rectangular panel contains dark-blue to black hieroglyphic signs arranged in multiple lines; the signs are bordered by a border rectangle. Individual sign forms are present but too unclear at this image resolution and wear to confidently transcribe specific words or determinatives. No cartouche is clearly legible. No figurative decoration or deity imagery is visible. Background is a neutral studio gray with even lighting emphasizing the cup’s form and inscription panel.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116423375 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 21.2.71 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 553730 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.