Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Arc sistrum of Tapenu, chantress of Sobek of Khenyt

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom–Late Period, ca. 1186–600 BCE. Cupreous metal. H. 36.1 × W. 8.4 × D. 5.5 cm (14 3/16 × 3 5/16 × 2 3/16 in.). Possibly from: Gebel el-Silsila, Southern Upper Egypt. Credit: Purchase, Dr. and Mrs. Edmundo Lassalle Gift, 1968.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A bronze/cuprous metal arc sistrum with a face-like terminal and curved frame, intended for rattling/ritual sound.

The object is a handheld arc sistrum: a tall vertical handle topped by a curved metal loop. Across the upper loop are several small horizontal metal rods/rattles (approximately three across the frame) that would move to create sound. The lower terminal has an applied sculpted face/mascaron with closed or half-lidded eyes and small side elements resembling ears or side curls, surmounted by a collar-like band. The face sits above a cylindrical handle with banded decoration near the top; the metal surface shows wear and patina. No readable inscriptions are visible on the handle or collar, and no clear cartouches appear in the image.

religious New Kingdom–Late Period (per catalogue); decorative bronze sistrum form good
Materials cupreous metalbronze/copper alloy (patinated)

Connections

Deities HathorSobek
Materials Cupreous Metal

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116245353 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 68.44 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 553814 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.