Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · ostracon

Ostracon

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Ostracon, hieroglyphic. New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19–20, ca. 1295–1070 B.C. Limestone, ink. H. 15.3 × W. 16.3 × D. 1.8 cm (6 × 6 7/16 × 11/16 in.). Probably from: Deir el-Medina. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1929.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A roughly rectangular limestone ostracon inscribed with multiple lines of dark ink hieroglyphs arranged across the surface.

The image shows a small, broken, irregular limestone fragment (ostracon) with a light tan background and visible chisel/break edges. Dense dark-ink writing fills most of the remaining face in several horizontal rows. The hieroglyphs include both standard sign forms and smaller stroke-like signs; some parts are abraded, and a diagonal crack or fracture lines interrupt portions of the text. No clear human figures, animals, or deity iconography are present—only writing. No cartouches are distinctly legible at this resolution; therefore no royal name can be securely identified. The overall layout and the presence of ink-only inscription are consistent with a New Kingdom administrative/literary or workers’ text from Deir el-Medina, but the exact content is not readable enough to excerpt.

hieroglyphic only New Kingdom, Ramesside (consistent with catalogue; exact reign unclear) fragmentary
Materials limestoneink
Signs mixed hieroglyph groups (unreadable at this resolution)

Connections

Found at Deir el-Medina
Materials LimestoneInk

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116430862 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 29.2.24 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 555541 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.