Funerary Cone
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, ca. 1550–1295 B.C. Pottery. L. 28 cm (11 in.); Diam. 8 cm (3 1/8 in.). From: Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Gift of Norman de Garis Davies, 1930.
The same text in other collections
Linked by shared inventory number
(MET-Object 555076).
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- MMA 30.6.57 PNM text
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A circular/rounded pottery object surface is covered with incised or impressed lines forming a dense inscription-like pattern that resembles hieroglyphic script.
The image shows a monochrome photograph of a small, thick, rounded object. The surface is dominated by a shallow, tightly packed field of black/raised marks that look like hieroglyphs or epigraphic signs, arranged in horizontal bands across much of the visible face. The marks vary in size and shape, consistent with carved/pressed Egyptian signwork, though wear and contrast limit precise sign identification. No clear painted color or iconographic figures are visible; the composition appears text-focused. The rim/edge is uneven and chipped, suggesting an excavated or worn ceramic artifact. No clearly legible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. No royal cartouche can be confidently read from this image.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Connections
Cross-references (5)
- Wikidata-Q Q116243771 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 30.6.57 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 555076 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- PNM-Object pnm:83908245 tier-2 (inventory-match)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.