Foundation plaque inscribed with the cartouche of Psusennes I
Description
Foundation Plaque, Psusennes I. Third Intermediate Period, Dynasty 21, reign of Psusennes I, ca. 1040–992 B.C. Faience. H. 13.8 × W. 7.4 × D. 2.5 cm (5 7/16 × 2 15/16 × 1 in.). Probably from: Tanis (San el-Hagar), Eastern Delta. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1955.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small, rounded-rectangular faience plaque fragment with a dark cartouche-like oval and surrounding hieroglyphic signs painted or incised in black/dark pigment.
The object is shown front-on as a vertical plaque with rounded corners and a slightly arched top. The surface is predominantly light blue/green with flaked areas. In the upper portion there is a dark, circular/oval cartouche-like element containing a central dot or small marking. Below it, multiple dark hieroglyphic signs are arranged in rows within the plaque’s field; the lower area includes shapes resembling lines and blocky strokes. No explicit deity figure is visible, and no additional language scripts (Greek/Coptic/Arabic) are apparent. The image is not detailed enough to securely read the royal name or other specific signs. Overall condition appears worn with losses at edges and paint/pigment abrasion.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116428209 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 55.144.3 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 555106 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.