Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Taweret amulet with double head

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, late–Dynasty 19, ca. 1390–1213 B.C. Glazed steatite. H. 2 cm (13/16 in.); W. 1.4 cm (9/16 in.); D. 0.4 cm (3/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Taweret. Credit: Gift of Lily S. Place, 1921.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small glazed steatite amulet depicting a double-headed female figure associated with Taweret.

The object is a small, front-facing amulet with two projecting faces/heads on the left and right ends, symmetrically framed by a central vertical form. The central body is shaped like a stylized torso with a prominent vertical striped/arched motif and a layered skirt-like band beneath, rendered in dark incised lines filled with turquoise-blue glaze. Both side faces have large circular eye elements and simplified facial features; the top has a rounded element suggesting a headdress or head region. The surface appears intentionally glazed in turquoise/blue with darker brown/black linework and some wear and chips, especially at edges.

religious New Kingdom (consistent with catalogue; exact sub-period unclear). good
Deities Taweret
Materials glazed steatiteturquoise-blue glaze

Connections

Deities Taweret

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116243709 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 21.6.73 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 555341 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.