Funerary Cone
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, ca. 1550–1295 B.C. Pottery. L. 2.5 × Diam. 9 cm (1 × 3 9/16 in.). From: Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Subject: Cartouches. Credit: Gift of Norman de Garis Davies, 1930.
The same text in other collections
Linked by shared inventory number
(MET-Object 554852).
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- MMA 30.6.106 PNM text
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A roughly oval fired-clay object with a recessed rectangular panel containing an incised band of hieroglyph-like marks and surrounding smaller incisions.
The image shows a small pottery funerary-type cone or cone-like form with a rounded outer body and a deep rectangular recessed area on the face. Within the recess there is a dense arrangement of short, carved, stick-like/rectilinear marks consistent in shape with hieroglyphic signs, though the individual signs are not clear enough to confidently read. The recess is bordered by a raised/eroded frame, and additional scattered small incisions appear on the outer surface. No clearly identifiable human figure, deity figure, or cartouche is visible in the provided view. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is apparent. The object surface looks chalky/eroded, consistent with an aged pottery artifact photographed in black and white.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Connections
Cross-references (5)
- Wikidata-Q Q116244377 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 30.6.106 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 554852 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- PNM-Object pnm:83908209 tier-2 (inventory-match)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.