Amulet of Harpokrates
Description
Amulet, Harpokrates. New Kingdom, Ramesside or Third Intermediate Period, Dynasty 19-20 or 21-25, ca. 1295–1070 B.C. or 1070–664 B.C. Lapis lazuli. H: 1.5 cm (9/16 in.). From: Cemetery or late New Kingdom houses, debris, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1906-09. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1909.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small blue stone amulet carved in the form of a standing human figure with a head-and-face detail and arms held close to the body.
The object is a vertically oriented amulet/block depicting a male human-like figure. The face has a simplified, incised/relief treatment with eyes and mouth; the figure’s arms appear crossed or held at the chest/upper torso. The body is covered by patterned or incised lines that may indicate clothing or ritual detailing, though specific hieroglyphs are not clearly visible. A small dark point is visible near the lower torso, but it is unclear whether this is an intentional feature, a loss, or a mounting mark. No cartouches or readable hieroglyphic inscriptions can be confirmed from the image. The overall coloration is consistent with a deep blue material typical of lapis lazuli, but only visual assessment is possible. The catalogue’s subject “Amulet of Harpokrates” is broadly consistent with the style of a deity/child-god-like figure, but the image does not allow unambiguous identification of Harpokrates specifically.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116281628 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 09.180.1181 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 557198 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.