Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Linen fragment

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Early Dynastic Period–Old Kingdom, Dynasty 1, 3–4, reign of Djet ?, ca. 2880–2465 B.C. Linen. Frame: 23 × 17 cm (9 1/16 × 6 11/16 in.). From: Tomb 2050, Tarkhan, Fayum Entrance Area, Egypt. Excavation: BSAE excavations 1911-1913. Credit: Gift of the Egyptian Research Account and British School of Archaeology in Egypt, 1914.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image shows a small, beige textile-like rectangular fragment in a display frame, consistent with an aged linen cloth piece.

A rectangular linen fragment is photographed front-on and mounted under glass or within a support frame. The surface is light tan with visible fiber texture and age-related discoloration and small white specks/patches. The edges are irregular and appear torn or abraded, with no clear design, figures, or legible markings visible on the cloth itself. A small printed/painted label-like mark is visible near the lower left corner of the mount (text is too unclear to transcribe). No hieroglyphs, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script are discernible on the fragment.

unclear Early Dynastic Period–Old Kingdom (per catalogue; image itself does not provide definitive dating) fragmentary
Materials linen (textile/fiber)

Connections

Found at Tarkhan
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.