Cartouche plaque of Amenemhat III
Description
Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 12, reign of Amenemhat III, ca. 1859–1813 B.C. Glazed steatite. l. 0.9 cm (3/8 in). From: Cemetery, debris, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1920–22. Subject: Cartouches. Credit: Rogers Fund and Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1922.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Small, rounded Egyptian cartouche-shaped inscription plaque with a dark-blue/green surface and visible hieroglyphic signs forming a royal cartouche.
The object appears as a small, vertical, cartouche-plaque form with rounded top and a flat-to-slightly indented base. The surface is mottled turquoise/blue-green with darker brown/black background areas, consistent with a glazed or coated steatite appearance. A set of hieroglyphic signs is painted/outlined in lighter yellowish-green strokes across the plaque; the exact reading is not fully legible from the image resolution. No separate figures of deities are clearly depicted—only inscriptional signs within the cartouche shape. There is no visible Greek/Coptic/Arabic text. The object’s general function and format match a cartouche plaque, but the specific royal name cannot be confirmed reliably from this image alone.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116282296 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 22.1.553 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 557026 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.