Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

String of Beads

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Beads, string. Ptolemaic Period–Roman Period, 2nd century BC–2nd century AD. glass, gold foil. L. 43 cm (16 15/16 in.). From: Egypt. Credit: Gift of Helen Miller Gould, 1910.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image shows a necklace-like string consisting of many small, uniformly spaced beads arranged in a circular loop.

A thin, flexible string forms a closed loop around the frame. The beads are small, cylindrical to barrel-shaped, and appear light-colored (likely glass) with occasional warmer/golden reflections suggestive of metallic foil or gold-colored accents. No figure, cartouche, or hieroglyphic text is visible; the focus is solely on the bead strand. The overall presentation matches the catalogue description of a “String of Beads.”

decorative Ptolemaic Period–Roman Period (as given by catalogue; no inscriptions visible to refine) good
Materials beads (likely glass)gold-toned accents/foil (unclear exact form)

Connections

Materials Beads

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116280793 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 10.130.3228 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 558905 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.