Papyrus Lid from the Embalming Cache of Tutankhamun
Description
Jar Lid, papyrus. New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Tutankhamun, ca. 1336–1327 B.C. Papyrus fiber. Diam. 10 cm (3 15/16 in.). From: Embalming Cache of Tutankhamun (KV 54), Valley of the Kings, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Davis/Ayrton excavations, 1907–08. Credit: Gift of Theodore M. Davis, 1909.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Round papyrus lid segment with radiating papyrus fibers, inscribed with an orange/red accession-like number across the center.
The object is a circular, disk-like fragment made of dried papyrus fiber arranged in radial segments, giving a fan/wheel appearance around a central plane. Along the middle of the piece there is visible orange/red painted or stamped text reading “05.199.242” (exact punctuation unclear), oriented horizontally relative to the image. No readable Egyptian hieroglyphs, cartouches, or Greek/Coptic/Arabic inscriptions are clearly visible on the surface; the orange marking appears more like a modern collection/registration number than an ancient inscription. Edges are irregular and the fragment is incomplete, with some fiber loss and small holes/damage visible.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116280798 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 09.184.242 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 558594 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.