Funerary amulet depicting one of the Four Sons of Horus, Qebehsenuef
Description
Ptolemaic Period, 332–30 B.C. Glass. H. 6.5 × W. 2.5 × D. 0.7 cm (2 9/16 × 1 × 1/4 in.). From: Egypt. Credit: Theodore M. Davis Collection, Bequest of Theodore M. Davis, 1915.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small blue-purple glazed faience/glass amulet shaped like a seated human-like figure with a raised arm and a raised, hooked element near the head, against a plain white background.
The object is a compact, vertically oriented amulet with a dark blue to purple surface and scattered lighter specks. The figure is seated on a low base/plinth. One arm is raised toward the chest/head area, while the other is positioned down along the side. Near the head there is a distinct protrusion that could represent a head-dress or associated attribute; the form is stylized and worn/abraded. No clear hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or inscriptions are visible on the front face in this image. The surface appears glossy and mottled, consistent with a colored glazed ceramic or glass-like material; however, the exact material cannot be independently confirmed from the image alone. The catalogue description specifies a funerary amulet depicting Qebehsenuef (one of the Four Sons of Horus), but the image resolution does not clearly show the diagnostic attribute (e.g., a specific vessel or distinctive iconography) needed to confirm which of the Four Sons is depicted.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116435870 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 30.8.281 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 559967 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.