Ostracon Depicting the God Sobek
Description
New Kingdom, Ramesside Period, Dynasty 19–20, ca. 1295–1070 BCE. Limestone, ink. H.12 × W. 14.3 × D. 3 cm (4 3/4 × 5 5/8 × 1 3/16 in.). Probably from: Deir el-Medina. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1929.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A limestone ostracon painted with red/orange ink showing a central standing figure with a forked or plume-like headdress and hieroglyph-like elements around/within the figure.
The object is a roughly oval ostracon of light tan limestone with chips along the edges. A standing, front-facing figure is rendered in red/orange ink, with a tall headdress or plume and arms/hands indicated in simplified lines. Behind or around the figure are vertical strokes and a partial bordered area, suggesting a structured scene or framed motif. The upper portion includes additional red marks that resemble incomplete hieroglyphic signs, but the forms are too fragmentary to read confidently. No clear Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. Although the catalogue assigns the subject as Sobek, the image does not show unmistakable Sobek iconography (e.g., a crocodile head) from this view; the deity identification is therefore treated as unclear rather than confirmed.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116438461 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 29.2.23 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 561595 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.