Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

see 57.180.42

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Amarna Period, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Red quartzite. From: Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Credit: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1957.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The provided image does not show an Egyptian artifact; it appears to be a placeholder graphic with the text “CONSULT PRIMARY RECORD.”

The image is a grey background with large black serif lettering reading “CONSULT” on the first line, “PRIMARY” on the second, and “RECORD” on the third. No object, materials (e.g., stone), inscriptions, cartouches, iconography, or any Greek/Coptic/Arabic text related to an artifact are visible. Because the artifact itself is not depicted, no deities, royal names, or hieroglyphs can be reliably identified.

unclear unknown poor
Visible text "CONSULT PRIMARY RECORD"

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 AI reading of the photograph

Visible text (machine reading)

CONSULT PRIMARY RECORD

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116438220 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 57.180.159 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 561156 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.