Linen fragment
Description
Early Dynastic Period–Old Kingdom, Dynasty 1, 3–4, reign of Djet ?, ca. 2880–2465 B.C. Linen. L. 20.3 × W. 15.9 cm (L. 8 × W. 6 1/4 in.); Frame (depth includes cleat): L. 21 × W. 16.5 × D. 3.8 cm (L. 8 1/4 × W. 6 1/2 in. × D. 1 1/2 in. in.). From: Tomb 45, Tarkhan, Fayum Entrance Area, Egypt. Excavation: BSAE excavations 1911-1913. Credit: Gift of the Egyptian Research Account and British School of Archaeology in Egypt, 1914.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Photograph of an uninscribed linen cloth fragment stretched in a frame, showing dense, fine weave and loose fringed edges along one side.
The image shows a rectangular linen textile fragment presented flat under glass. The surface is dominated by a uniform, tightly woven fabric with faint horizontal and vertical threading visible. Along the right edge, the cloth is frayed with a row of loose, curled fibers resembling fringe. The left edge also shows some irregular tearing/fraying, while the rest of the textile remains intact. No painted, carved, or stitched figures are visible, and there are no clearly legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or other markings on the textile surface. The object appears to be only textile material without decorative iconography discernible at this resolution.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116433923 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 14.4.89 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 559250 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.