Funerary Cone of the High Priest of Amun Hapuseneb
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Pottery. H. 7.3 cm (2 7/8 in.); W. 7.5 cm (2 15/16 in.); preserved L. 12.5 cm (4 15/16 in.). From: Tombs TT 65 and TT 66, forecourt, Sheikh Abd el-Qurna, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1914. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1915.
The same text in other collections
Linked by shared inventory number
(MET-Object 559384).
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- MMA 15.10.41 PNM text
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small, rounded terracotta funerary cone fragment with a circular face showing incised painted/dark-red hieroglyphic text and signs.
The object appears to be a pottery cone or cone fragment, photographed from the front. Its face is decorated with a tightly framed circular/oval field containing multiple incised hieroglyphic signs. The signs are rendered in dark red/brown against a light beige clay surface, though some erosion and edge loss make parts of the text difficult to read precisely. No clear figurative deity imagery, human figures, or cartouches are confidently legible in the visible area. The background is plain studio lighting, and only the cone’s decorated face is clearly shown.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (5)
- Wikidata-Q Q116280263 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 15.10.41 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 559384 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- PNM-Object pnm:83909450 tier-2 (inventory-match)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.