Papyri.info — DDbDP (Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri) — text · ostracon

o.sarga.112

Letter via HGV-meta

Letter to a superior about purchases for building work. Fragmentary Coptic letter on an ostracon from Wadi Sarga, addressed to a monastic superior ('your fatherhood'). After greetings, the writer informs him about men and a need for something, apparently to be bought for building work. machine translation

Source of record: Papyri.info — DDbDP (Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri) — text — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

The same text in other collections

Linked by Trismegistos ID TM 87610. Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.

  • Letter HGV-meta Wadi Sarga (Antaipolites)VI - VIII

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Coptic · Coptic

Transcription

† † ϩⲁⲑⲏ ⲙⲛ ⲡϣⲁϫⲉ ⲧⲓἀσπάζεσθαι ⲛⲧⲉⲧⲙⲛⲓⲱⲧ […] ⲧⲓⲧⲁⲙⲟ ⲧⲉⲧⲙⲛⲓⲱⲧ […] ϩⲉⲛⲕⲉⲣⲱⲙⲉ ⲛⲁⲛ ⲙ[…]ⲧⲟⲕ ⲉϥⲟⲗ ϩⲛ ⲉϥϫⲱⲙ[…] ϣⲁⲛⲉⲣχρεία ⲡϭⲟⲗⲉⲡ […] ϫⲓⲛⲉⲧⲡⲉ ⲛϥⲧⲟⲟⲩ ⲛ[…] ⲉⲡⲕⲱⲧ ⲉⲙⲟⲛ ⲉⲓⲥ ⲡⲉⲱ[…] […] ⲙⲡⲉⲛϭⲉⲛ ⲑⲩ ⲕⲱⲧ[…] […]ⲥ ⲕⲉⲧⲁⲓⲟⲩ ⲛϥ[…] ⲙⲡⲣϭⲱⲡⲉ ⲛⲓ [… ? lines lost …]

Translations (1)

EN AI · machine translation from the DDbDP edition (Claude Opus 5.5)
† † Before all things (?) and the word [...] I greet your fatherhood [...] I inform your fatherhood [...] some other men for us [...] ... carrying (?) in ... [...] we have need (?) of the ... [...] from above (?) and buy them [...] for the building, otherwise (?) behold the [...] [...] we did not find ... building [...] [...] other ... and he [...] do not neglect (?) ... [... lines lost ...]

Cross-references (3)

About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Papyri.info — DDbDP (Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri) — text.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.