Fragment of an official decision concerning a dispute over vacant building plots at Soknopaiou Nesos, sold by a priest (prophet). The prophet claimed they were ancestral property, while the accuser Nestnephis argued they had belonged to an old laarches and so fell to the Idios Logos; the outcome orders Satabous to pay 500 drachmas for confirmation of the plots.
In English machine translation
[…] of vacant plots
[…] the prophet declaring that the plots sold by him had been held by his father and his ancestors, which were his ancestral landed property, of which he still holds a tower and a forecourt and other appurtenances; while the accuser Nestnephis declared in reply that the whole area of the plots, in which the tower and the forecourt and the plots sold by the prophet lie, had belonged to a certain laarches of old and fall under the Idios Logos. We have placed (the matter) under examination because the elders do not agree on the same point, but have certified in writing concerning the sold vacant plots alone that they appeared to them to be ownerless […] of administration […] not to have produced […]
Satabous […] let him be required to pay for confirmation of the vacant plots 500 drachmas.
The Idios Logos was the Roman account administering ownerless and confiscated property. A laarches was a Ptolemaic-era official (leader of native troops), and much of the wording at the line beginnings is restored.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below. It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.